Best (affordable) upgrade option for the Nikkor 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 VR kit lens?

Started 4 months ago | Questions thread
nfpotter
Senior MemberPosts: 3,822
Like?
Re: I don't agree.
In reply to Shunda77, 4 months ago

Shunda77 wrote:

Buzz Lightyear wrote:


Yes, I can see the advantage of having extra wide-angle and telephoto reach available on the 16-85, however my opinion regarding the image quality of the 16-85 was based on those more experienced than I with evaluating camera lenses.

My opinion was based on direct experience with both lenses, when I found actual laboratory test data comparing both lenses on the same body, it only confirmed my experience as being accurate.

Basically, I found that I was able to get sharp results in a much wider range of light than I could with the 18-55 kit lens, I was also able to focus faster and more accurately, manual focus override has also proven to be very useful. Manual focus is next to useless on the kit lens. Shooting from a tripod after sunset when manual focus becomes important is extremely difficult with the 18-55 and it is just not wide enough for landscapes.

Maybe you are right, but in my fractured thinking, it doesn't seem practical to me (or maybe anyone else with a limited budget) to pay extra money for a new "walk-around" lens that, according to Ken Rockwell (and others), has an equivalent image quality to the kits lens, but still lacks at least 200mm of telephoto range that I now have by keeping the kit lens and adding the 55-300 lens that I purchased - all for about $200 less than the price of the 16-85 alone!

I purchased my 16-85vr second hand for half the new price.

For me the kit lens was a complete waste of time, it just isn't practical as a walk around nature/landscapes lens, even combined with a tele option. The focal length is just not long enough, too much lens changing simply ruins the enjoyment of this kind of photography.

I found that the 16-85vr added exactly the right mix of image quality and creative freedom, others may find their needs are different based on the subject matter they shoot.

But the OP specifically mentioned nature/landscapes, and if he is serious about landscapes the 16-85vr is simply the best option out there, you simply can not do the same photography or have the same user experience with the kit 18-55.

18mm is plenty "wide enough" for landscapes, and the difference between 16 and 18 is not much.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow