Forum indexNikon SLR Lens TalkChange forum

Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread

Forum

scst48

Forum Member • Posts: 90

Like?

Re: Nikon 70-200mm f/4G VR – Incredible!

In reply to Philcathor, 5 months ago

Philcathor wrote:

I think it' a very good choice : lighter and cheeper than the f/2.8, lighter. Nasim Mansurov had tested it : http://photographylife.com/category/cameras-lenses

--
Cheers,

Philippe

Thanks

--
Stefan

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	scst48	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	MGPowell	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	scst48	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Phillip S	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Guidenet	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	scst48	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Shotcents	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	NorCalAl	5 months ago	1
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Hondo Lane	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Hondo, take a look	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	wasserball	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Michael Benveniste	5 months ago	1
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	nikkorwatcher	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Michael Benveniste	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	bkclarke	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	thomas2279f	5 months ago
Re: IMO too close to the 2.8 price-wise.	rtf	5 months ago	2
Agreed	gadgetmann	5 months ago
Re: Agreed	Dayjobdave	5 months ago
Re: IMO too close to the 2.8 price-wise.	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Nothing at all ... see a couple of samples in body	b33g33	5 months ago
Re: Nothing at all ... see a couple of samples in body	opiecat	5 months ago
Very nice, sharp lens, much smaller and lighter...	maljo@inreach.com	5 months ago
Re: Very nice, sharp lens, much smaller and lighter...	Astrophotographer 10	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	md lucero	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	NorCalAl	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	nikkorwatcher	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	NorCalAl	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	fft81	5 months ago	1
Indeed, it does not exist.	brightcolours	5 months ago
Nikon 70-200mm f/4G VR – Incredible!	Philcathor	5 months ago
Re: Nikon 70-200mm f/4G VR – Incredible!	scst48	5 months ago
I just tested mine with ISO 11223 chart	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Re: I just tested mine with ISO 11223 chart	scst48	5 months ago
Re: I just tested mine with ISO 11223 chart	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Re: I just tested mine with ISO 11223 chart	opiecat	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	xtm	5 months ago	1
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	flbrit	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	flbrit	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	ormyatomic	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Bing Chow	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	scst48	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	slimandy	5 months ago
Re: widening the thread	Leonard Shepherd	5 months ago
Re: widening the thread	flbrit	5 months ago
Some interestinf DXOMark comparisons.	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Re: widening the thread	tundracamper	5 months ago
Nikon 70-200mm f/4G ED VR lens tested at DxOMark by NikonRumors	Philcathor	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	marike6	5 months ago	1
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	scst48	5 months ago
Re: Tripod and VR use of the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	mmalkin15	5 months ago
Re: Tripod and VR use of the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	scst48	5 months ago
Re: Tripod and VR use of the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	joejack951	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	qbo	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Bing Chow	5 months ago	1
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	brunobarolo	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Steve Bingham	5 months ago
Re: Whats wrong with the Nikkor 70-200 4.0 VRIII ?	Bob Moulton	5 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!	120
"Bokeh" overrated? I think so!	77
Why not a Pentax FullFrame - that's simple, ...	67
Which camera, driving me crazy!!!	61
New rumour on SAR	58
* Wed C&C (No Theme) Thread, Ed. 269, 13 06 19 *	58
If I owned an NEX-3 or NEX-5 variant, THIS is ...	48
Why 'Sony' not taken seriously?	44
$2000 mft Budget	41
Considering switching systems	40
*Monday Macro/Closeup June 17, 2013*	37
SL1: Urban wildlife up close	36
All Shots are soft 7D	35
Looks like Nikon's new 18-35 is kicking some butt!	34
GF6 gets DxOmarked	34
Excellent IQ from Fuji X : show me.	33
Purchasing opinion	30
Spyder Calibration Software	30
Fuji X-E1 vs Canon 6d with 24-105 L	29
post process this image	29