Why always compare to DLRS?

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
ballwin12
Junior MemberPosts: 43
Like?
Re: Why always compare to DLRS?
In reply to Michael Everett, 4 months ago

Michael Everett wrote:

Yes, NEX and DSLR are not comparable...because no way a NEX system, including NEX 7,6 can compete with DSLR...( from D5100 to D800..) both in IQ and AF speed.

AF I will grant you. IQ no. Except maybe for the D800 and a few FF DSLR's the Nex's, especially the 7, will produce as good and in many cases better IQ that most DSLR's. It smokes most APS-C sensors.

Okay, NEX 7 can give similar IQ with D3100/5100 for landscapes, portraits... But no way it can compete with D7000/ D300( yes , they re APS-C) and D600/700/800 .

First, if you miss AF then how can you get good IQ ?

Second, please give me  a list of NEX lenses that are comparable ( both in AF speed and IQ) with Nikon lenses like 24-70, 85 1.4G, 14-24, 70-200, 35 1.4G..

Third, the design of a compact camera can not give you the best handling/composing while shooting as DSLRs do.

Last, show me any event photographers that use sorely NEX cameras? If they are comparable, why they have to carry a bundle of big/heavy DSLRs..?

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow