
6 hours ago
|
Re: Canon 70-200 f2.8 is ii vs f4 IS for the non-pro
In reply to DoctorS,
4 months ago
|
I had both sold the f4, never used it. Always went for the 2.8 better in low light and an extra stop of blur. I'm not a big guy and the weight is not a problem.
--
http://productphotographysydney.com
http://michaelleadbetter.com.au
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago |