|
Re: 105 Micro Nikor f2.8
In reply to ddavey,
4 months ago
|
ddavey wrote:
paulski66 wrote:
ddavey wrote:
i went to the local camera with full intentions of buying this lens....it would not stay at 2.8 in manual mode on two different bodies. Even well beyond macro distance same thing happened. i tried the 60mm and it worked perfect.....so i assumed the lens was defective....Knowing now that it is suppose to do that ...i will definitely NOT be buying this lens. Its really to bad the lens build quality was amazing
I'm now looking at the Sigma 150mm macro
Well, if you're lucky the Sigma won't report the correct effective aperture to the camera, so you'll never know that it's doing the EXACT SAME THING.
Ignorance is bliss, I guess...
Are you calling me Ignorant paulski66?
If the shoe fits...
--
Regards, JR
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 2 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 5 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago |