|
Positive and Negative Arguments
In reply to Nancy and Pete Spader,
4 months ago
|
I will have to say, in favour of Foveon, the following arguments hold for me..
+ve,
It is much more easier to achieve the 3-D or V-ish effect with a Foveon camera than with a Bayer one, particularly the small sensor compacts.
-ve,
Ignoring imperfections in techniques, camera shake, exposure, WB etc.. it is much more difficult ( though it is too early but maybe I will stick my head out and say, impossible) to get the "mushiness" in a Foveon image, than it is in a Bayers image, if everything is done correctly.
So if the above holds true, it is a no-brainer which camera to choose if the 3-D or V effect is considered desirable !
--
Be Vegan, Make Peace !
World Vegan Meditation has started ! Join now ..
lasm
http://www.suprememastertv.com
http://www.crisis2peace.org/
http://iwillsavetheearth.blogspot.com
http://www.godsimmediatecontact.com/lasm/sign.jpg
http://gallery29564.fotopic.net/
http://s493.photobucket.com/albums/rr294/Lasm/Nikon%20D90/
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 3 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 |