Well. From 43 Rumors we can read this.

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
captura
Senior MemberPosts: 5,207
Like?
Re: The usual viefinders vs screens debate.
In reply to Guy Parsons, 5 months ago

Guy Parsons wrote:

EarthQuake wrote:

Composing with a viewfinder is much more natural, not to mention the stability benefits of holding the camera to your eye, and ability to keep both eyes open while looking through a viewfinder to track moving subjects. There are plenty of reason to use an OVF/EVF even with the best rear LCD you can possible imagine.

That's where we differ, after 40 or 50 years of peering through viewfinders it was a wonderful release to be able to use the screen for composing and to see what's about to intrude into the scene. Plus of course the subject(s) also get to see your face and that helps a lot in many situations.

To me now, using the screen is the natural way. I see users holding DSLRs to their face and to me it now looks very awkward. And feels awkward when I dust off my E-300 and peer though its tunnel-like viewfinder.

I do own the VF-2 but hardly ever use it. It is of use for critical manual focus and for awkward on-the-ground stuff with my E-PL1 and I do carry it. Maybe gets used about once a month.

I'm not an "oldie" either, I started shooting with digital cameras, so....

The "arms length" thing just isn't conducive to most photography, sure using the rear screen is great to get at odd angles, but a VF is much better when it comes to composing your shots.

Well, it's hardly arm's length, maybe about 12" or so from the face. The people who complain are the ones who do not get the proper glasses as they get older. In my case triple focus zones on the prescription and it works perfectly to look from scene to screen.

It's always good to have these discussions otherwise the many lurkers do not know that there are alternative ways to do things. Different methods suit different folks for varying reasons.

Regards....... Guy

Hey Guy!

I use the VF-1 occasionally and still prefer my E-PL1. But for very low light, an APS-C...got a new one. Oh well, it's a good place to hang manual lenses.

Now I transferred my old best-example kit lens onto this new one. All the systems have these...it's inevitable with mass manufacturing and cheap quality control. They only use random sampling for these cheaper lenses I believe. So I wondered, could a business make a go of testing lenses and certifying those of say the top 5% 'tile, for sale at a higher price? My idea.

Steve

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow