Best Camera of 2012: Sony you should learn for this!!!

This is where we disagree. I'm in the m4/3 forum all the time and especially when it comes to nature shots or specifically birds in flight.

There has been a few threads in there lately on this subject with people using either the Oly 75-300 or the Panasonic 100-300. I don't really want to point those out because it was a little embarrassing for the original poster.

Then we have these sorts of shots from Jack using the LA-EA2 and the opposite from what you just said TOTALLY acceptable.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/50573886

So if I compare those to what I've seen in the m4/3 forum, well there is no comparison, so we disagree for sure on that adaptor. It makes subjects possible with NEX that are not with m4/3........... better say IMO.

Then you can add Justin in here as well as Dirk. Justin uses the 55-210 with an add on and its brilliant. Dirk uses the adaptor as well, I honestly can't see a problem like you do.

All the best and I would personally take the adaptor over m4/3 any day.

Danny.

--
Birds and macro. NEX and m4/3
http://www.birdsinaction.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nzmacro/