What is wrong with this Minolta lens?

Started Dec 31, 2012 | Questions thread
Calico Jack
Senior MemberPosts: 2,139Gear list
Like?
Re: What is wrong with this Minolta lens?
In reply to Chioti, Dec 31, 2012

Chioti wrote:

Thanks Paul and everyone who helped. The lens is being returned.

In terms of a newer lens a similar focal range to bridge the gap between the 16-50 and 70-300 what are good alternatives?

-- hide signature --

Stelios

Two spring to mind.

Minolta AF 24-105mm (D)

Minolta AF 28-135mm F/4-4.5 Macro (Secret Handshake)

The latter is the best and has a long MFD (unless macro is engaged to reduce it), but the former is a half decent lightweight walkabout.  There are several other options such as the Minolta or Sony 24-85mm F/2.8 which again are both full frame as well as the Tamron SP 28-75/2.8 Di, but many have said the Sony AF SAL 16-105mm DT is a decent option as well and it's APS-C.  Have you done a search on Dyxum and cross-referenced a short list on both the MHohner and Kurtmunger websites in addition to Dyxum?  It would make sense to then sell the 16-50 if you went with the 16-105mm, but the options are many depending on price, format, aperture and focal length.

-- hide signature --

Mark @ Sonolta * Photography

 Calico Jack's gear list:Calico Jack's gear list
Sony Alpha DSLR-A850 Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM Tamron SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di USD Adobe Photoshop CS6 +23 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow