QUICK LINKS:VideosSample ImagesCamera TimelineLink Directory

connect.dpreview.com geasrshop.dpreview.com

News ReviewsBuying GuideSample Images Articles Cameras Lenses Printers Software Forums Galleries Challenges

Forum indexOpen TalkChange forum

Why so little in body image stabilization?

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread

IrishhAndy

Contributing Member • Posts: 868

Like?

Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?

In reply to Woland65, 5 months ago

Woland65 wrote:

Why do not Canon and Nikon offer bodies with IBIS? (Just turn it off for stabilized lenses.) Why do sony chose to offer Nex without IBIS?

I don't get it. I can't really see the disadvantage with IBIS. Olympus seems to have no problems with either price or size for IBIS. IBIS also seems to be just as effective as stabilized lenses.

What am I missing?

They have big lenses.

--
A solution looking for a problem !

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	nikkorwatcher	5 months ago	2
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	nikkorwatcher	5 months ago	2
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Leon Wittwer	5 months ago	1
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Leon Wittwer	5 months ago	1
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	nikkorwatcher	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Leon Wittwer	5 months ago	2
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Leon Wittwer	5 months ago	1
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	goetz48	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Leon Wittwer	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	RedFox88	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	RedFox88	5 months ago	2
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Leon Wittwer	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	cplunk	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Bart Hickman	4 months ago
Just look at how Minolta/Sony did it...	Joseph S Wisniewski	5 months ago	7
Re: Just look at how Minolta/Sony did it...	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Just look at how Minolta/Sony did it...	Barry Fitzgerald	5 months ago
Re: Just look at how Minolta/Sony did it...	nikkorwatcher	5 months ago
Re: Just look at how Minolta/Sony did it...	Barry Fitzgerald	5 months ago	1
Re: Just look at how Minolta/Sony did it...	noirdesir	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Cane	4 months ago
You're missing the patent owners!	Mike_PEAT	5 months ago
Re: You're missing the patent owners!	Woland65	5 months ago
So are you, LOL	Joseph S Wisniewski	5 months ago	2
Re: So are you, LOL	oklaphotog	5 months ago
Ah kids these days...	amosf	5 months ago	3
Re: Ah kids these days...	malabraxis	5 months ago
Ah oldies these days	mujana	5 months ago	1
Re: technocrats these days	malabraxis	5 months ago
Dinosaurs can do better:-)	mujana	5 months ago
Re: Dinosaurs can do better:-)	malabraxis	5 months ago
last word on this	mujana	5 months ago
Re: last word on this	amosf	5 months ago
Re: technocrats these days	oklaphotog	5 months ago
Re: Ah oldies these days	oklaphotog	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Jeff Peterman	5 months ago	1
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	MeanGene2	5 months ago	1
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Zamac	5 months ago	1
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	ljfinger	5 months ago	1
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Paul C	5 months ago	1
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	ljfinger	5 months ago	1
Tiny, incremental upgrades?	Joseph S Wisniewski	5 months ago	2
Re: Tiny, incremental upgrades?	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Tiny, incremental upgrades?	PhotoHawk	5 months ago
Re: Tiny, incremental upgrades?	plevyadophy	4 months ago
Why does the raw file format even matter much?	noirdesir	4 months ago
A different calculation...	Joseph S Wisniewski	5 months ago	1
Re: A different calculation...	john farrar	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	mosswings	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Woland65	5 months ago
One possible reason....	Marty4650	5 months ago
Video, existing equipment	TrapperJohn	5 months ago
Re: Video, existing equipment	Piginho	5 months ago	1
I love IBIS	TrapperJohn	4 months ago
Re: I love IBIS	Piginho	4 months ago
This is precisely why I won't buy a NEX (nt)	Alphoid	5 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	RedFox88	5 months ago	3
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	IrishhAndy	5 months ago
OT (sort of) - sensor tilt	Zamac	5 months ago
Re: OT (sort of) - sensor tilt	Joe Pineapples	5 months ago
Canon offers IBIS in many of its digicams (small sensor/larger sensor)... they know it's limitations	sdyue	5 months ago
Re: Canon offers IBIS in many of its digicams (small sensor/larger sensor)... t	headfirst	4 months ago
They do?	ljfinger	4 months ago
lens based	RedFox88	4 months ago
Darwinism... (n/t)	Joe Pineapples	4 months ago	3
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	herebefore	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	CFynn	4 months ago	1
Heat dissipation during video?	Chris R-UK	4 months ago
Chris... and it probably was a good decision	Marty4650	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	pavi1	4 months ago	1
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	headfirst	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	pavi1	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	headfirst	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	pavi1	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Aasmund Midttun Godal	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Leon Wittwer	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	nikkorwatcher	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Aasmund Midttun Godal	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Aasmund Midttun Godal	4 months ago
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?	Doug J	4 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

About us Write for us FAQ Feedback Interest-Based Ads Privacy Legal

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.

Mobile site