D7000 -> D600 Upgrade Observations w/Samples (Extreme Conditions) Autofocus Improvements

I agree, but only when we're talking about cameras listed on the forum header.  We could post "upgrade" information about a few Canon cameras, Panasonic, Sony, etc and so on, but that's not the purpose of the different forums, AFAIK.

If I "upgraded" to a Canon 1d X, do you think it would be appropriate for me to start a post here, exclaiming how much better it was, than my (and your) d7k and d5100?

Folks who desire info on Canons or Pannys or Sony or Nikon FX only need to click on the appropriate forum, the FX forum in this case, and read all the hype and joy contained therein.

You don't need a d600 to get better AF performance. The d300 will do just as well, maybe better, for low light performance. That's the point of the different models in the Nikon line.  Better features, better performance, cost more money.

I'm not offended, John. I'm not trying to offend you either. I just don't think these "FX IS WONDERFUL" type posts are appropriate for the DX forum. You may not intend it, but there are lots of folks here that can't afford to buy a d600. Yet seemingly every week, folks like you think you need to start a thread to state, and then try to demonstrate, that their DX camera is inferior. Seems rather rude and crude to me. But, I'm not a Mod, so it's just my opinion.

Kerry

--
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/root