Forum indexNikon FX SLR (D1-D4, D600-D800) TalkChange forum

Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread

Forum

panos_m

Senior Member • Posts: 1,078

Like?

Re: Cameras don't "render" RAW files, they display embedded JPG

In reply to RedFox88, 6 months ago

RedFox88 wrote:

Your camera is actually viewing a small, compressed JPG

No the embedded jpeg in D800 NEFs (and all other modern Nikons) is full resolution (36mpixels) medium compression without exif and it is rendered by the in camera raw converter on the fly from the raw data with the selected picture control settings.

--
Panagiotis

Edited 6 months ago by panos_m

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	rbekkers	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Carsten Pauer 2	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	apaflo	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	sshoihet	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	pavi1	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	apaflo	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	DecibelPhoto	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	apaflo	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	apaflo	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	wireless	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	eNo	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	5 months ago	4
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	CFynn	5 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	5 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	AlephNull	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	MOD TOF guy	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	apaflo	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	6 months ago	1
Rendering here means de-mosaicing (+additional image processing like sharpening etc.)	noirdesir	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago	1
Absolutely! and one more	MOD TOF guy	6 months ago	1
and one more	Iliah Borg	6 months ago
Re: and one more	lovEU	6 months ago
Re: and one more	MOD TOF guy	5 months ago
Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	ZAnton	6 months ago
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	sjprg	6 months ago	1
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	ptox	6 months ago	1
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	apaflo	6 months ago
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	sjprg	6 months ago
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	apaflo	6 months ago	1
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	sjprg	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	sjprg	6 months ago
Consedering your experiences with the i7 920 processor	rbekkers	6 months ago
Re: Consedering your experiences with the i7 920 processor	sjprg	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	AZBlue	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Stacey_K	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Truman Prevatt	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	imax2k2	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	6 months ago
Cameras don't "render" RAW files, they display embedded JPG	RedFox88	6 months ago
Re: Cameras don't "render" RAW files, they display embedded JPG	panos_m	6 months ago	1
Re: Cameras don't "render" RAW files, they display embedded JPG	RedFox88	6 months ago
And 'render' can mean other things than 'display on screen'	noirdesir	6 months ago	1
Re: And 'render' can mean other things than 'display on screen'	RedFox88	6 months ago
I use a PC and I don't have any of these problems.	olyflyer	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	hdkhang	6 months ago
It doesn't even take 0.25 sec	Martin Datzinger	6 months ago	1
Re: It doesn't even take 0.25 sec	chlamchowder	5 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	rbekkers	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Art Jacks	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	rbekkers	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Stacey_K	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	5 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Stacey_K	5 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	_sem_	5 months ago
Try LR 4.3	eNo	6 months ago
Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	Joseph S Wisniewski	5 months ago	2
Thanks	chlamchowder	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	apaflo	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	noirdesir	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	chlamchowder	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	noirdesir	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	MOD TOF guy	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	apaflo	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	noirdesir	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	pavi1	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	panos_m	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	pavi1	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	pavi1	5 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Insensitive composition..	81
Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!	64
The Weekly 4/3 DSLR Images 13 06 17	58
JPEG vs. RAW - An experiment	52
32mm f/1.2 - more (bad) pictures	52
Leica M Monochrom vs DP2 Merril in a BW ...	49
*Weekly Wildlife Thread: June 16 - 22*	46
Olympus alternative to Lumix 12-35???	43
A good cat picture with the Olympus 17mm 1.8 ...	42
Why not a Pentax FullFrame - that's simple, ...	42
Ruined nex	41
Share an image because of it's color	35
Uninspiring performance of Nikon 105mm VR micro	35
If you had to choose between the 12mm or the ...	35
GR — capable camera but stereotyped use	30
Does anyone use X-pro 1 profesionally?	28
VF-4 is a Revelation	27
Harley Davidson 110th anniversary in Rome...	27
The D600 and Sigma 35mm f1.4 (high rez picture ...	26
E5 shutter dies ... in the middle of shooting ...	25