Why so little in body image stabilization?

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
RedFox88
Forum ProPosts: 18,920
Like?
Re: Why so little in body image stabilization?
In reply to Woland65, 5 months ago

Woland65 wrote:

nikkorwatcher wrote:

Woland65 wrote:

Sony/Minolta implemented IBIS successfully on OVF cameras

Please show us the evidence that sensor stabilisation produces a stabilised image in an optical viewfinder, and then you can shame Canikon.

Of course it doesn't, but that isn't necessary either. Again, just look at how Minolta/Sony did it. If anything I get the impression that those users usually think that the IBIS implementation is an advantage, not a disadvantage.

Sorry but that would be a no-go option for professionals - not being able to properly compose the image they are photographing.

If you are using a stabilized lens then you can just turn off the IBIS and use the in lens stabilization instead if you want a stabilized OVF.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow