Buy a D600 or a D700 ?

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
chlamchowder
Senior MemberPosts: 1,816
Like?
Mostly agree
In reply to chipmaster, 6 months ago

I'll add my 2cents to what seems to be some very extreme views here.

I came from using a D700 for two years and about 40K frames of sports/low light, then 50K frames on a D3s. Now own a D4 ( 2k shots ), D600 ( 7K shots and going ).

It is true the D600 has a few "pro" features removed, but anyone who tells you that its cheap build, slow AF haven't pushed the D600. IMHO the D600 to 6400 ISO downsampled is hard to tell different at normal viewing than D4. 4 years brings a lot of superior technology.

I have yet to miss focus on the D600 and wished that I was shooting the D4. The D4 I bring out for serious sports shooting, almost all other times its D600. Why you ask, super quiet shutter, amazing IQ, great balance of resolution / file size, fast enough performance.

I have that oil thing, haven't cleaned the sensor, has yet to ruin a single picture....

I agree - I'm tired of people claiming the D600 can't track fast action in low light. They either bolted on the slowest screw drive lens they could find, forgot to take the lens cap off, or didn't know how to configure the AF system.

There are situations where the D3 is a bit better (subjects at close range coming in very fast), but for non-sports shooting, I'll take the D600. For sports shooting, it's a wash....the D600 gives more tack sharp photos, but the d3 is better at getting things roughly in focus if things are charging head-on.



Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow