Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
A Owens
Senior MemberPosts: 1,882
Like?
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?
In reply to apaflo, 5 months ago

apaflo wrote:

A Owens wrote:

There is no sensor that can produce a jpeg directly. The embedded jpeg, which is shot with the picture control settings, comes from what? Think a little about it.

[...]

You are talking about creation of the raw file, we are talking about rendering it once it is created. This is ALWAYS done from a jpeg in-camera while LR renders the preview from a raw file.

He is talking about rendering the RAW data to get the embedded JPEG. It doesn't get there by magic, the camera's hardware/firmware renders it.

LR on the other hand first previews the embedded JPEG that the camera rendered, and then renders the RAW data to produce its own version of a JPEG. LR's preview is fast only because it need not render the RAW data to get a preview. The camera does not have that advantage, as there is no JPEG available at all until the camera renders the RAW data to produce the embedded JPEG.

Rendering is the process of generating an image from a model (file), so when you talk about "rendering the RAW data to get the embedded JPEG", this is incorrect.  The camera NEVER uses anything other than this embedded jpeg to render the image on the rear LCD and that is why it is so quick.

Your second paragraph also suffers the same confusion. It is simply not true to say that the camera renders raw data. It does not. It only ever renders the jpeg embedded into the raw data at the time it is written. When rendering, the camera never accesses the raw data.

--
Alistair Owens
http://www.alistairowensphotography.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow