Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	rbekkers	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Carsten Pauer 2	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	apaflo	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	sshoihet	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	pavi1	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	apaflo	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	DecibelPhoto	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	apaflo	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	apaflo	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	A Owens	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	wireless	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	eNo	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	5 months ago	4
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	CFynn	5 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	5 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	AlephNull	6 months ago	2
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	MOD TOF guy	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	apaflo	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	6 months ago	1
Rendering here means de-mosaicing (+additional image processing like sharpening etc.)	noirdesir	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	panos_m	6 months ago	1
Absolutely! and one more	MOD TOF guy	6 months ago	1
and one more	Iliah Borg	6 months ago
Re: and one more	lovEU	6 months ago
Re: and one more	MOD TOF guy	5 months ago
Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	ZAnton	6 months ago
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	sjprg	6 months ago	1
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	ptox	6 months ago	1
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	apaflo	6 months ago
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	sjprg	6 months ago
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	apaflo	6 months ago	1
Re: Because hardware A/D converter is worlds faster than versatile computer program.	sjprg	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	sjprg	6 months ago
Consedering your experiences with the i7 920 processor	rbekkers	6 months ago
Re: Consedering your experiences with the i7 920 processor	sjprg	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	AZBlue	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Stacey_K	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Truman Prevatt	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	imax2k2	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	6 months ago
Cameras don't "render" RAW files, they display embedded JPG	RedFox88	6 months ago
Re: Cameras don't "render" RAW files, they display embedded JPG	panos_m	6 months ago	1
Re: Cameras don't "render" RAW files, they display embedded JPG	RedFox88	6 months ago
And 'render' can mean other things than 'display on screen'	noirdesir	6 months ago	1
Re: And 'render' can mean other things than 'display on screen'	RedFox88	6 months ago
I use a PC and I don't have any of these problems.	olyflyer	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	hdkhang	6 months ago
It doesn't even take 0.25 sec	Martin Datzinger	6 months ago	1
Re: It doesn't even take 0.25 sec	chlamchowder	5 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	rbekkers	6 months ago	1
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Art Jacks	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	rbekkers	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Stacey_K	6 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	noirdesir	5 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	Stacey_K	5 months ago
Re: Why does rendering on a PC take 10 seconds compared to 0.25 seconds in-camera?	_sem_	5 months ago
Try LR 4.3	eNo	6 months ago
Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	Joseph S Wisniewski	5 months ago	2
Thanks	chlamchowder	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	apaflo	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	noirdesir	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	chlamchowder	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	noirdesir	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	MOD TOF guy	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	apaflo	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	noirdesir	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	pavi1	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	panos_m	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	pavi1	5 months ago
Re: Because PCs use much more spohisticated algorithms...	pavi1	5 months ago

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

* Wed C&C (No Theme) Thread, Ed. 269, 13 06 19 *	68
Which camera, driving me crazy!!!	66
If I owned an NEX-3 or NEX-5 variant, THIS is ...	63
New rumour on SAR	60
Why 'Sony' not taken seriously?	57
$2000 mft Budget	50
Excellent IQ from Fuji X : show me.	44
Looks like Nikon's new 18-35 is kicking some butt!	41
GF6 gets DxOmarked	40
Why no more CCD sensors?	39
OM-D E-M5 after 1 (one) year owner reports	38
All Shots are soft 7D	37
post process this image	34
SL1: Urban wildlife up close	34
Purchasing opinion	30
Photographylife's 80-400 af-s review up	29
Next Pentax release (september) choose ONE option	29
Do I tell my friend they suck?	29
New Sony mirrorless incompatible with NEX?	28
Comparison FZ200, Lx 7, Sony rx100	27