DXOmark: the 135L - far worse than the Sigma 85, get it second hand

Started Dec 28, 2012 | Discussions thread
Paul Boothroyd
Senior MemberPosts: 1,720
Like?
Re: DXOmark: the 135L - far worse than the Sigma 85, get it second hand
In reply to Paul Boothroyd, Dec 28, 2012

I remember reading the Amateur Photographer review of the 135/2L back in 1996 when it was first introduced and the report concluded by saying something like, " the sharpest lens we have tested so far".

I immediately wanted one, even if I wasn't using Canon back then....

When I did get one I wasn't disappointed, and still aren't.

The 135/2L also takes the Extenders, losing nothing with the 1.4x and been more than usable with the 2x if necessary.

-- hide signature --

Paul

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow