DK on the a99

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
phiri
Contributing MemberPosts: 964
Like?
Re: DK on the a99
In reply to Nordstjernen, 5 months ago

Nordstjernen wrote:

phiri wrote:

Dave Oddie wrote:

In the footnote he says:

"Like it or not, the Alpha 99 is actually competing with the 6D and D600, and it does not matter to the market that some aspects of its construction and specification are closer to 5D MkIII ‘build’. Sony is doing something in enthusiast-level photography right now that it has done well in the past in television and audio, positioning its pricing as a premium consumer brand. The DSC-RX1 specification and pricing tells you everything you need to know about how Sony sees the market."

That is a matter of opinion and in mine he's wrong there. It's precisely these things that are going to determine price of cameras more and more form now on. Not the sensor or number of pixels.

You want features the A99 has such as articulated screen and in-body stabilisation that a D600 lacks? Don't expect them for free. The underlined text reminds me of the Nikon 3200 v A77 comments we saw on this forum.

I am not saying the A99 price is right but its features are worth a premium over a camera with a similar sensor that lacks them.

While you are right that the a99 has to be compared to the D800 and 5DMKIII, however the perception in the real world is different. Look at all these comparisons between the D600 and a99. It has been even done here so many times. The problem with Sony was the timing of the release of the camera. It should have been released much earlier so as to be well positioned. So DK is right in that regard. Some may know better, but the general practice has been to compare the a99 with D600. If it was not the case, the price argumnet would not have held water.

No surprise!

People are comparing price, sensor size, numbers of pixels and high ISO noise, which actually doesn't mean that much for everyday photography results. They don't look much at other aspects of the camera, like the set of features, ergonomics and handling. For me, excellent ergonomics makes this camera a pleaseure to use, and easy handling of the very good raw files is a time saver that matters more than all the other factors mentioned together!

When you learn a camera to know and can take benefit of it's strength and compensate for the weaknesses, you will get better results with this camera than you would from a camera you don't know that well. At the end of the day, the numbers of keepers is what matters! Not hardly noticeable differences in noise level.

Just a few are discussing what makes a spesific camera the best tool for a photographer. For me the very good tracking focus is highly welcome (confugurated for the actual task). I haven't seen many in-depth tests of this important aspect of the A99.

Yu are the guys who know better. Howvere just because a few go much deeper than what looks on the surfacw is not going to help Sony. As long as people compare this camera to the cheaper models, D600 and Canon 6D, it is tough call for the company. Again the poll at the front of the page, gives an indication of this problem. People are not looking deeper when it comes to the a99, which unfair yes but that is how the situationbstands at the moment

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow