DK on the a99

'Comparing the A99 with the A900, there is a clear one stop gain in ISO related performance above 1600. But at 100 to 400, the A900 from raw has a kind of fluid quality – the pixels seem to merge and give a luminous yet crisp image. The A99 never really produces this special quality at low ISO, though at the expanded 50 setting it’s impressive. Perhaps there’s an element of illusion in this, that the exceptional optical image through the A900 finder conditions me to see the final picture differently.'

It could be nice to see some images that show this. Or perhaps there is an element of illusion to the statement 

...but really, could it be so? The images I have seen on the net seemed to show otherwise: a new crispness and tonal range which I didn't see with a900 (I own one) be it hi or low ISO.

Comments?