4/3 Prices

that isnt true at all
look at your argument this way
if GH3 isnt significantly better than GH2 is, cheap FF isnt significantly better than GH3

D600 is $2699, 6D is $2100, but 6D DR will prove to be a tad under GH3 if its the Sony sensor on board. If it isnt the Sony speculations to the wind.
Noting the advantage to D600 for DR, which costs a little more

Im thinking theres a mixed up bag of tricks here
what are we comparing, cheaper FF like 6D with the expectation its really 5D3
APSC with the expectation that it performs like FF ?
this against the most expensive largest mFT,

I mean fine if thats the comparison you are making
but there does seem to be some separation in performance and capability in various areas,
not all of it goes FF's way

isnt it possible to obtain something worthwhile (and a fair bit more handsome) like G5, a handful of lenses for less than $6k, which seems like a pretty high price to me

remember if you want the best out of FF you still need pricier fast glass
otherwise I suspect it isnt going to be significantly different to shooting with GH3

indeed the laudable bargain that 6D is might deliver a camera that is noisier and has less DR on the same DoF. At the performance of all these cameras that isnt by any means a bad thing as long as you play your options with some intelligence.

--
Riley
any similarity to persons living or dead is coincidental and unintended
support 1022 Sunday Scapes'