TechRadar compares RX1 to FF competition

sean lancaster wrote:

Bill, I feel like you didn't even read what I wrote. Let me just quote what TechRadar wrote about the dynamic range of the JPGs from the RX1:

JPEG results for dynamic range show that the Sony RX1 is weaker than the other cameras, starting off below the Sony Alpha a99 and Nikon D800 but slightly above the Canon EOS 5D Mark III at ISO 50, before falling into last place at ISO 100 and above. The gap is only slight in the low to mid-range, but plummets sharply at ISO 3200 and above.

I only criticized the JPGs of the RX1 and I said the dynamic range for RAW on the RX1 is fairly average. At some ISOs it's high and even tops and others is last place. Fortunately, all of the cameras are fairly bunched together so being average is probably an accurate statement for any of the cameras being compared. You're acting like I am comparing the RX1 to every camera in the world; I am not. It's just being compared to the A99, D800, and the 5D3. We could say that all 4 of these cameras are "world beating DR" no?