Carl Zeiss T*Distagon 2/24mm ZA isn't 24mm ???

Started Dec 24, 2012 | Discussions thread
JacquesBalthazar
Regular MemberPosts: 461Gear list
Like?
Re: Carl Zeiss T*Distagon 2/24mm ZA isn't 24mm ???
In reply to Mava, Dec 26, 2012

Mava wrote:

A few years ago I had the opportunity to test a Leica 24mm/2.8 Elmarit-R ( manual focus )that was rebuild to fit on Minolta and Sony A-mount.
The conclusion was almost the same . At apartures 8-11 the Minolta was as good as the Leica . Only at 2.8 - 4 - 5.6 the corner sharpness of the Leica was a lot better than the Minolta . When you shoot landschapes or architecture at 8-11 the Minolta is as good as a Leica or Zeiss .

in fact, that Leica Elmarit-R 24mm was a Minolta design, built with Minolta glass, identical to the Minolta branded MD 24mm f2.8 of the time. I do not recall if the later A-mount version was the same design or not, but, if it was, performance should have been identical at all apertures, bar sample variations.

 JacquesBalthazar's gear list:JacquesBalthazar's gear list
Nikon Df Nikon AF Nikkor 180mm f/2.8D ED-IF Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.4G Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/50 Voigtlander 58mm F1.4 Nokton SL II +22 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow