|
Re: Standard RAW processing worthwile?
In reply to Starred,
5 months ago
|
I used to shoot jpegs exclusively, mostly to save space and time. I've recently switched to shooting RAW, because it gives me great flexibility to fix the exposure when I do something stupid.
I do an automated conversion when I import, which gives me a full res jpeg with default settings applied - that makes for a perfectly usable image in most cases, and for snapshots and stuff where I don't care that much about image quality, I can use those jpegs directly. But I also have the raw image, which gives me a lot more control, and for shots that matter I can spend more time on them and create something much better than the default jpeg would have given me.
With the cost of storage today, there isn't really a good reason to shoot jpeg anymore. You can shoot raw+jpeg in camera, or just shoot raw and do an automated conversion when you import. Either way, you end up with a usable jpeg and a raw file to fall back on if you need it.
Jeff
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |