I can't find a better P&S camera than my S95!

YiannisPP wrote:

Thanks for checking. I had honestly not looked at the house poster pic as it's it's a pick a a poster and I always thought that to be a bad idea. But you're right, the RX100 doesn't look good there. I do not know the reason why, but it is definitely not a representative. You do know they have studio shots at base ISO as well, no? Have a look as well and you'll see what I mean. Dismissing something based on one shot is not something I would do, but then again you do what you want.

I wasn't convinced by Sony neither before and I was one of those people who were advising others to always buy Canon for compacts and ignore Sonys, Samsungs "because they have no photographic pedigree" etc. But things do change and you mustkeep an open mind. You might want to read from people who have had both cameras (S95/S100 and RX100). There are many, many of them commenting ion these pages. They have had first hand experience with both, taking the same pic with both and comparinf under the same conditions. And they all agree on exactly the opposite of what you've concluded: The RX100 is in a different higher class than the S95. Not perfect by any means but still clearly superior in all lighting conditions (expect from shots taken from very close).