|
Re: Yeah, keep repeating that and it you might convince yourself, lol
In reply to YiannisPP,
5 months ago
|
YiannisPP wrote:
Marco Nero wrote:
YiannisPP wrote:
mjdundee wrote:
I will sign this - without any hesitation.
You 'll have to wait for the next generation of sensors/engines before something improves significantly. If you shoot daylight and need details nothing with such a form factor beats the CCD of the S 95 yet.
There is something in such form factor that beats the S95 quite comfortably, it's called the RX100!
Rubbish! The RX100 is a KNOCK-OFF CLONE of the s95... only with WORSE noise reduction and in inferior processor... If it wasn't for the smearing on of certain details, the best you could say about the RX100 is that it's a pretty good counterfeit. All the other reviewers have noted these things so have a think about this before you troll the Canon forums
I think you have some issues, taking defending some camera company so personally. Seriously. Most of my previous cameras have been Canons. But when another company clearly surpasses them (copying them or not it doesn't matter), then I open my eyes. I suggest you do too.
The RX100 blows the S95 out of the water. It's not even in the same class. Let the viewers go to the imaging-resource compare images page and see for themselves.
I just checked what you are recommending. I was talking about daylight shots - so I compard the House Shots from Image Resource - not the studio high ISO tests.
Pls feel free to do the same and you might discover that the S95 delivers with half of the resolution considerably more and much sharper details from corner to corner.
So I have to agree - Sony is not in the same class as Canon. They are in the class for people who can't afford a Leica but are willing to pay extra for a blue dot on their copied design compact that seems to promise better photographs - at least written on the paper.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 2 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
