12 hours ago
|
Re: RX100 and High ISO
In reply to Digital Nigel,
6 months ago
|
Digital Nigel wrote:
YiannisPP wrote:
Digital Nigel wrote:
YiannisPP wrote:
Digital Nigel wrote:
YiannisPP wrote:
Digital Nigel wrote:
ericN2 wrote:
Digital Nigel wrote:
I'm assuming these high ISO pics were all taken using AMB mode (the non user selectable ISO4000 is a give-away)? Obviously the RX100, like any other camera, wouldn't do as well in single frame mode, which is what most other cameras have to use. I think that the Sony multi-frame noise reduction means that even a small sensor camera like the RX100 can compete with a full-frame camera for very high ISO shots. Of course, it only works well for static images.
Sorry to disappoint you but these werre ALL shot in 'P' mode with ISO set to max at 6400.. I've never used that AMB mode you speak of.. it just came by the camera as it saw the pic at the time.. same with all..
I've been doing some experiments and have discovered behaviour I hadn't noticed before. If I shoot in P mode in very low light in RAW or RAW+JPEG, it just takes a single shot at max allowed ISO, and there's no delay in seeing the review image.
But in Fine mode, it behaves differently: I can hear the shutter firing several times (3?) and then there's a delay of several seconds with a Processing image message, before the review image appears. This has less noise than I would have expected at high ISOs. So, is it just doing some intensive noise reduction, or is it running an undocumented multi-frame mode? I suspect the latter.
I don't think it's possible that it's doing that in P mode, it would be very weird.
So why the multiple shutter firing and the long processing time?
Let me think, must be some setting you have tweaked and forgotten!
Try it with yours, and see if you get the same effect. I find it occurs in all the PASM modes, with very high ISOs. It would certainly explain why Fine mode seems to sometimes produce better results than RAW.
Just did. Definitely only one shutter and no post processing delay... ISO 3200
Just to confirm, that's Fine output, and in the menu, High ISO NR Normal and Long Exposure NR On? I can't think what else could affect it
All correct. A mode, shutter speed 1/10 sec. Maybe you're talking about too slow shutter speeds? I just tried 0.4sec and still normal behaviour. It is very weird that yours is doing this. It is late though (at least here it's 3am) and in the night we do miss obvious things!
Could be that you have a somewhat defective unit? It is far fetched, so probably not... the interior of the cathedral you posted also seemed a bit uncharacteristic for ISO3200 from the RX100, but that might just be due to sub-optimal RAW conversion.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
