Have I been ripped off?

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
D Cox
Senior MemberPosts: 2,858
Like?
Re: Have I been ripped off?
In reply to RonJG, 5 months ago

RonJG wrote:

None of that explains why the Sigma images are so small when compared to the D800 images. Nor does it explain why the Sigma images are processed at 180 dpi.

Is there a way to get the images to 300 dpi?

Ron,

What program do you do your post processing with?

Sigma software that came with the camera. I also tried converting the raw files to 16bit tiff and processed them in PS CS6

In Photoshop, go to "Image Size", and uncheck "Resample Image". Change the resolution in pixels per inch to 300. The Width and Height pixel numbers should be unchanged.

Note that the dpi figure is purely a guide to the printer driver software as to what size the image should be printed. It is more relevant to scanned images than to photos from cameras, as it allows the printer to give a print of the same size as the scan. When printing from a camera, you don't want a print the size of the sensor (about an inch wide), so the dpi figure can be set to anything you want.

The width and height figures will be greater for the D800E.

I'm not making a huge complaint. I'm just trying to work out why people say the SD1M is equivalent to 30mp Bayer cameras.

A Bayer camera has pixels which are not independent of each other. Instead of each red pixel being an independent measurement, it is a calculated value derived from neighboring pixels. In a Foveon sensor, each pixel gives three independent readings of the local light.

So the Foveon generates much more data than a Bayer with the same width and height. Maybe not three times as much, but nearly so.

The improvement is counteracted by higher noise levels, so at higher ISO settings the data are less reliable.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow