
|
Yea, the narrow domain
In reply to Kendall Helmstetter Gelner,
6 months ago
|
or maybe narrower domain. ISO 200 or less.
The shots you showed are showing resized down. The ones that are low iso will do well (not that many cameras wouldn't do a reasonable good job that can compare with these images too). The ISO 800 as we discussed before it's something that I believe I even mentioned a Pentax Q would come close at that size. I even posted you the examples, I don't remember hearing back.
So you have shots at ISO 800 or less where ISO 800 doesn't look all that good. And we aren't getting into the color constancy issues- which you easily get by ISO 400, often at ISO 200 - and if we are going to talk about "ultimate image quality" and comparing with other cameras- yes, they have to be mentioned.
The shots you showed do not show much special, honestly.
But to be fair, I should say the narrower domain. You can certainly do a lot at ISO 100.
--
Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- I photograph black cats in coal mines at night...
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | 3 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |