What's the deal with prime lenses

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
rattymouse
Forum ProPosts: 12,851
Like?
Re: What's the deal with prime lenses
In reply to Tomasu1, 5 months ago

Tomasu1 wrote:

Many people thanked Fuji for listening to enthusiasts when designing the X-pro1 camera. One reason for this was that they released three fast prime lenses rather than just basic zooms.

But tell me, what's all the commotion with prime lenses in general? Yeah, you may get sharp corners, but isn't it MUCH more convenient to shoot with zoom lenses.

This last sentence of yours is the crux of the issue, IMO.  I think it can be best summed up as: Limitations enhance creativity.  Maybe this does not work out 100% of the time, but I would be big money that it does work far far more often than not.  Limitations imposed upon the artist generates struggle and through this struggle monumental works of art appear.  Now very few at DPR (myself firmly included) are high level artists, yet the same concept applies.  I see this very clearly in my own images when I shoot film.  Being limited to 16 shots/roll of film dramatically changed the way I shot, and I could clearly see that I was much, much happier with my film work than digital.  Digital is so damn convenient to shoot hundreds of images without much work at all.  Many folks here talk about owning a camera for less than 6 months and having shot off 10,000 images or more.

Some of my favorite musicians were early electronic music artists back in the early '70s when the synthesizer first appeared.  Amazing works of music that took hundreds of hours to produce a 40 minute LP.  The old analogue synths needed hours and hours of tuning because they were very unstable machines.  There was no MIDI so whole new recording techniques needed to be developed.  Enormous challenges that pushed the artists to the limit.

Today, all this music is digital and the same artist produces very ho hum work; work that will easily be forgotten compared to the timeless masterpieces of the early '70s.  Today albums are pounded out 2-3 per year instead of 1 every year.  Quantity over quality, that is the legacy of most digital work.

The challenge was lower so the art suffered.

I love shooting a single prime strictly for the challenge.

You get the exact crop you want without moving around and it's a way more convenient not to carry around 2-3 different lenses. Changing lenses takes time and can be even risky sometimes as you can damage the lens / sensor.

I don't think it's an image quality issue either as there are very good zoom lenses available. Even though they are expensive, you probably still save money compared to buying 2-3 different primes.

So be honest. What's the point with prime lenses? Are they just for pixel peeping or photography elitists and rest of us can benefit from the convenience of zoom lenses?

--
DISCLAIMER: The text written herein is meant to provide the opinions and/or suggestions of the author. No statement herein is meant to be considered law of the land, representative of any party or group, and or a quote from any party or group. Neither is any statement in the contained text meant to be taken as scripture, doctrine, or all encompassing of an entire populous or any groups or individuals therein.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow