IQ of Panasonic 14-45 f3.5-5.6 vs. Panasonic 12-35 f2.8

Started 5 months ago | Question thread
FrankParis
Contributing MemberPosts: 669
Like?
Re: IQ of Panasonic 14-45 f3.5-5.6 vs. Panasonic 12-35 f2.8
In reply to boxerman, 5 months ago

boxerman wrote:

Why would you qualify "if you shoot RAW" if there's no problem correcting with JPEG too? Didn't you also say "If you only ever shoot JPEGs, it's a problem"? Hard (for me) to see how it could be a problem if you can clean up JPEGS just as you can RAWS.

You're the only one saying that's "no problem" correcting with JPEGs. The post you're answering doesn't say that!

I have been a JPEG shooter who post-proceses often. If you were me, how would you read what you wrote? (My post-processed JPEGS have been in juried shows, so it's not an insane thing to be a JPEG shooter who post-processes.)

But this is an argument nobody stands to gain anything by pursuing.

This is wrong. You stand to gain an understanding with what is wrong with post-processing from JPEG images if you truly understood what lossy compression does in image file formats.

--
Frank Paris

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow