Community Moderators

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
pdqgp
Veteran MemberPosts: 9,626
Like?
How about admins or owners?
In reply to lenshoarder, 5 months ago

lenshoarder wrote:

I don't believe members should be moderators. Member moderators create two classes of members. The special people and everyone else. Whether they intend it or are even aware of it, that little icon will give them the color of authority. Whether they intend it or are even aware of it, they will biased when dealing with someone they've had a heated exchange with.

If members want to be moderators, then they should stop being members. Perhaps a middle ground can be that member moderators that are actively involved in a forum should recuse themselves from moderating in that forum. Member moderators should only moderate issues in forums they couldn't care less about. Without actual and perceived impartiality, a moderator goes from being an arbiter to a bully.

How about  Lars and other admins?  How about Phil Askey when he owned the board and posted?

I can't think of one message board / fourm I'm a part of that is moderated by non posting members.  Doesn't make sense.  That's like telling security guards and police they can't participate in their own community.   In business there's actually a concept of letting teams police themselves in terms of  behaviors.

The badge next to the mods names is transparency in action.   That's a good thing.  There's no "power" that should be associated with a mod.  They simply apply edits and corrections to ensure the rules put in place by those in charge.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow