IQ of Panasonic 14-45 f3.5-5.6 vs. Panasonic 12-35 f2.8

Started 5 months ago | Question thread
FrankParis
Contributing MemberPosts: 669
Like?
Re: IQ of Panasonic 14-45 f3.5-5.6 vs. Panasonic 12-35 f2.8
In reply to boxerman, 5 months ago

boxerman wrote:

This, of course, is a constant refrain on this forum. My question is why can't JPEG be correct for CA? Certainly it could be converted to many other formats, and processed in them. Why am I completely stuck with CA from JPEGs? (I hope the answer is not something stupid like nobody has implemented the algorithm for anything but RAW. But, then, maybe that would give some of us hope.)

Once an image is read into memory from disk, regardless of the format on disk, image processing programs are ignorant of the format on disk. The computer only sees an array of pixels. But every time you save that array to disk, the algorithm to compress to JPEG degrades the image. So don't start with a lossy compression format like JPEG. Saving to JPEG should be the last step of PP, and the last step of PP should be sharpening. I always work with TIF (a lossless disk format) until I'm ready to sharpen. Then I save to JPEG. But anything worth keeping I save the raw file in case I later change my mind or want to do some further experimenting. I don't keep TIF images on my hard disk after I've got an image the way I want it for keeping.

--
Frank Paris

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow