FT v MFT lenses

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
britcam
Regular MemberPosts: 487
Like?
Re: FT v MFT lenses
In reply to faith_ps, 5 months ago

faith_ps wrote:

The FT lenses will always have an edge no matter. But.. by how much percentage better? If it's only less than say... 5% better that mft, that will make people readily and easily move to MFT. The weight saving and the money saved on MFTs is already more than 5%.

I think FTs will be left to the aficionados. And perhaps a very minute number of curious people who want to taste the FTs prowess.

Jakop

--
The saxophone is a very interesting machine, but I'm more interested in music.
Steve Lacy quotes

Those who have used the SHG f2 lenses know the difference. It is very considerable indeed. That is why those still owning HG & SHG 4/3 lenses are so reluctant to buy into the µ4/3 system.

And those who suggest that f2 lenses are bloated and overpriced, will I wager, have truly never seen the results.

The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. ~Edward R. Murrow

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow