D700 users who have bought D600 - Thoughts and comments?

eNo wrote:

I just shot an event with 2 D600 bodies, the type of job I would give to the D700, and I gotta say, I didn't miss my D700 bodies at all.

• I know a lot has been made about the AF differences, but I haven't had any AF fails with the D600, even in some very tough, low-light scenarios.
• I do notice the focus points are more bunched, but it doesn't affect the way I shoot and what I shoot. I can see why it might be an issue for sports, but not a killer one.
• I do notice the D600 is lighter, and I do notice its grip is smaller, and since my hand aren't as wide as some, that's fine for me.
• I do notice I have dual slots I can use for backup, whereas before I had to hope for the best during critical, can't-lose-100-photos situations.
• In terms of IQ, the bottom line, I do notice less noise at high ISO, and a lot more dynamic range at base ISO.
  

The D700 is an awesome camera that has served me extremely well, and I am keeping one of my bodies. Much to my relief, I have learned that D700 and D600 color rendition is extremely close, so the two can partner side-by-side in a job without requiring heroic PP color-matching. Still, I think a lot of what transpires here and elsewhere in defense of the D700 over the D600 is rationalization to justify sticking with the older body over other choices.