How really is FX better....

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
shigzeo ?
Contributing MemberPosts: 639
Like?
Re: How really is FX better....
In reply to Stephen Brenner, 6 months ago

Stephen Brenner wrote:

lukep wrote:

And I can afford FX - the main reason i dont want it is extra weight and size


The D600 isn't much bigger than my D7000.

I'm very impressed with the IQ and the 28-85 is just as sharp as the 18-105.

Still, both are much much larger than Nikon's film cameras of the same calibre. If you choose Ai/pre-Ai,AiS or AFD lenses, size isn't an issue. AFS sizes are the issue, often more than double the volume of AiS lenses of the same focal length and speed. Nikon's lenses get bigger and bigger every year.

--
flickr
O image - audio photography

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow