How really is FX better....

lukep wrote:

I have been reading that FX is better especially on the wide end. But how? Seems we have more cheaper, lighter, but still good wide lenses down -- 10-24 and even an 8-16! FX does not have that many UWA - just a few and they are heavy.

Granted FX will be better low light, better overall image quality for pixel peeping, and better DOF choises.

I have a D200 and am looking to upgrade - I have a lot of nice FX glass like 70-200, 105 vr, 35 f2, 70-300vr, 180 D 2.8. My main DX investment is 10.5 fish. I do shoot sports a lot but also tons of family stuff and vacations with the kids.