100 2.8L IS Macro vs. 135 2.0L for handheld portraits

Started Dec 17, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
petrhino OP New Member • Posts: 15
Re: 100 2.8L IS Macro vs. 135 2.0L for handheld portraits

Thanks all for the thoughtful replies! I wouldn't say I'm closer to a decision though

I currently own the 85 1.8 and the 70-300 4-5.6 IS USM.

The macro abilities and IS of the 100L are appealing, though it is somewhat close in focal length to my 85. The 135, with it's aperture and potential use for the occasional inside sports I shoot, would no doubt be a winner as well. I don't think I can go wrong!

 petrhino's gear list:petrhino's gear list
Fujifilm X100S
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
kkx
MAC
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow