100 2.8L IS Macro vs. 135 2.0L for handheld portraits

Started Dec 17, 2012 | Discussions thread
petrhino
New MemberPosts: 15Gear list
Like?
Re: 100 2.8L IS Macro vs. 135 2.0L for handheld portraits
In reply to MirekE, Dec 18, 2012

Thanks all for the thoughtful replies! I wouldn't say I'm closer to a decision though

I currently own the 85 1.8 and the 70-300 4-5.6 IS USM.

The macro abilities and IS of the 100L are appealing, though it is somewhat close in focal length to my 85. The 135, with it's aperture and potential use for the occasional inside sports I shoot, would no doubt be a winner as well. I don't think I can go wrong!

 petrhino's gear list:petrhino's gear list
Fujifilm X100S
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow