100 2.8L IS Macro vs. 135 2.0L for handheld portraits

Started Dec 17, 2012 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
petrhino
New MemberPosts: 15Gear list
Like?
100 2.8L IS Macro vs. 135 2.0L for handheld portraits
Dec 17, 2012

I just got a 6D and have read lots of glowing reviews for both of these primes. Aside from the focal length differences, can anyone chime in on which might be better for handheld portraits in all types of light?

They are basically the exact same price at this moment on Amazon.

Thanks!

 petrhino's gear list:petrhino's gear list
Fujifilm X100S
Canon EOS 6D
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow