|
Re: Oly 45mm versus 60mm
In reply to george4908,
5 months ago
|
george4908 wrote:
You'll also notice that the hay strands immediately in front of the figure are a little less out of focus on the 60 than the 45. Normally you would expect the longer lens to have the shallower depth of field, but the 2.8 maximum aperature more than offsets this. Would be interesting to see the same shot with the 45 at 2.8.
You know... I've been wondering myself to what extent the additional FL of the 60 (60mm versus 45mm) compensated for its smaller aperture (f 2.8 instead of f1.8) in terms of the blurring of background.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 2 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |