
12 hours ago
|
Re: Thinking of upgrading G1 - but lens or body?
In reply to ADSinger,
5 months ago
|
ADSinger wrote:
The G5 is a very big step up in high ISO. 1600 on the G5 is comparable to 400 on the G1. I'm happy with the decision.
Alan.
Great to hear that, I guess ISO400 is nearly the same on G1 and GF1 which I have and it is perfectly acceptable. Is this improvement in JPEG processing engine only or RAWs are significantly better too?
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |