How Come X-E1 IQ Lags Behind Many Others In Studio Shooting?

I can't say the X-trans sensor is better, but in some ways it has clearly out-shined it's Bayer sensor competitors. When it comes to low light and noise, the X-trans puts the the competition to shame. I agree that there are issues with it and the current RAW processors, but we're also talking a first generation sensor. Think about smaller sensors where noise levels go through the roof after iso 400. The X-trans could really be a game changer there. For similar sized and larger sensors at low iso settings, the X-trans output is good, but it falls short in a number of places. This could due to the processing algorithms or the sensor. Who knows. If Fuji keeps developing the X-trans hopefully we'll see it progress and we'll eventually get the best of both worlds. It wasn't like the Bayer sensor became what it is overnight either.

Either way, my pics look great as 8X10's or on-screen when I'm shooting at ISO6400, f1.4 at 1/60. Really that's as far as 99% of all my personal photos go so I'm a happy camper. This is something that every other camera I've owned that's not FF couldn't do.