Just posted: Our In-depth Sony SLT-A99 review

Started Dec 12, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Alexdi Junior Member • Posts: 30
Re: Strange logics
1

You want creativity? Try handholding a prime in low light such as the excellent Zeiss 85 1.4 AF with IS; no can do with Canon. Is the 5D III bad for the scenario? It's probably okay for some, but it lags Sony.

-- hide signature --

Zeiss taste...Beercan budget!

If you say. The Canon equivalent is f/1.2, not f/1.4, so a half-stop quicker. The 5D III also focuses at EV -2 (and the 6D at EV -3). The A99 is rated to EV -1. If the light levels were severe enough to merit IS, you wouldn't catch focus at all with any Sony body. That's aside from a full stop of noise performance both Canon bodies net, which will keep the shutter speed high enough to avoid motion blur.

Put simply: when it comes to getting the shot, I'd have my money on Canon. That translucent mirror isn't inconsequential; to get better Live View AF and superior motion tracking with video, you're giving up performance at the extremes of still photography where every photon counts.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Sol
ck3
ck3
al.
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow