How Come X-E1 IQ Lags Behind Many Others In Studio Shooting?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
Emacs23
Regular MemberPosts: 302
Like?
Re: How Come X-E1 IQ Lags Behind Many Others In Studio Shooting?
In reply to Trevor G, 5 months ago

Trevor G wrote:

This is a serious question.

It is obvious from my posting history that I support Fuji and their innovativeness, as well as the results from the finished, marketed products.

Here are screenshots from the JPEG and RAW comparison sections in the X-E1 review. The results are essentially the same as for the X-Pro 1.

Why are even the X-E1 JPEGs inferior, markedly, to these three other cameras. One is even just a µ4/3 sensor but it is noticeably sharper!

Look at what happens with the green feathers on the Fuji, compared to the others. First, the JPEG:

The RAW result is no better:

It looks as if Fuji cannot resolve green detail. Is that why Fuji seem to have trouble with foliage?

What is wrong here?

--
Cheers
Trevor G
Silkypix tutorials at: http://photo.computerwyse.com

DP samples are not quite reliable, but it's the real problem for sure. Silkypix helps a bit here, but still bayer sensors are superior, here is the comparison between
NEX-7    Pentax K-5iis
NEX-5n   Fuji X-Pro1

OOC jpegs from fuji are even worse.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow