GH2 vs GH3 - Long Exposures and Astrophotography (Test shots inside)

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
Zoeff
Regular MemberPosts: 141
Like?
Re: GH2 vs GH3 - Long Exposures and Astrophotography (Test shots inside)
In reply to Anders W, 5 months ago

Anders W wrote:

mpgxsvcd wrote:

On Thursday night I will be comparing my GH2 to my GH3 with my 8" telescope. There are a couple of hidden features on the GH3 that could make it the best Astro Photography camera to date.

This thing is a real gem. If only these clouds would go away sooner.

These two pictures say a lot about the difference between the GH2 and GH3 for Astro Photography.

Sorry but what are you trying to prove with this comparison? The GH2 was given 2 EV more exposure (f/1.4 rather f/2.8, shutter speed and ISO the same) and thus reaches a brightness where you can see the noise. The GH3 image is pretty much at black level so less visible noise.

While the GH3 probably does better than the GH2 for noise at ISO 4000, this doesn't tell us a whole lot about the visible difference when the two are shot under comparable conditions.

2 EV more exposure? Neither camera has received any exposure. That's the whole point, what you are seeing more of in the GH2 shot compared to the GH3 shot is a buildup of noise over time with a 60 second exposure.

The noise floor is way higher in the GH2 under identical conditions. (Barring temperature changes, but I'm going to assume that mpgxsvcd knows about that)

EDIT: nvm, I see mpgxsvcd already explained himself.

Edited 5 months ago by Zoeff
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow