So which is better? "GH3" or OM-D?

Started 5 months ago | Question thread
digifan
Senior MemberPosts: 2,139
Like?
Re: Myth...
In reply to amtberg, 5 months ago

amtberg wrote:

Louis_Dobson wrote:

I already HAVE an OM-D, and I had the GH2 before. The GH2 shot too slowly, had only a single dial control, had no wireless flash system, and was a bit bulky.

The GH3 is much faster and has wireless flash, but is bulkier than the GH2.

I suspect that still image quality is a wash, while the GH3 is generally better at video. EM-5 is smaller and has IBIS. GH3 has more controls, better interface, and wifi.

Neither camera is generically better than the other. It just depends on one's needs and preferences.

Am using the GH3 and OM-D at the very moment. Although ergonomically better handling with the GH3 they are both equally fast. The GH3 being much faster is a myth.

The only thing a little bit better is the 20mm 1.7. But that always had issues on Oly bodies.

The rest of the lenses are equally fast performing on both bodies.

That's my take up to now.

--
Digifan

Edited 5 months ago by digifan
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow