Q with 06 lens versus 5DmkII with 70-200 IS II

So a strange compare between the Q with my new 06 tele @ 200mm equivalent against the Canon 5D mk II with the 70-200 2.8 IS II @ 200 mm. Done in good light at a far distance at f 2.8. Exposure and processing the same from RAW in ACR.

How much detail can the 06 lens resolve against a absolute champ the Canon 70-200 IS II on a FF camera. Funny details: Less then 300 grams against more then 3000 grams, or a € 500,00 combination  against a € 3800,00 combination. 21 mp vs 12 mp.

Sharpened both in ACR, custum WB on satellite disc, further processing the same.

Here are the shots:

5D mark II with 70-200 IS II (full shot)



Q with 06 tele lens @ 36.5 mm (200mm eq) (full shot)

5D mark II 100% crop

Q 100% crop

So what do you think..

--
Bye4now
http://members.home.nl/rsmals/DPR/Me.jpg
http://www.indots.nl
I have the deepest respect for all those people who like me.