|
Re: 16-80CZ vs 24-70CZ vs 16-50 on A77
In reply to esmall,
5 months ago
|
Great comments! Thanks! Very Helpful.
I'm leaning between the 16-50 or the 16-80.
Now when factoring the prices...
I can get a used 16-80 for $475 (used, original owner) a little nervous given the low price, need to check it out.
Or
a 16-50 for $650-$695 used from various locations.
What would you do?
--
Ernest
a77/a300/Tamron 10-24mm/Tamron 17-50 f2.8/Tamron 70-200 f2.8
/Minolta 24-105/Minolta 100-200/Minolta 50 f1.7/Tamron 90 SP Macro
http://www.ernestsmallphotography.com
See my PhotoStream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ernestsmall/
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |