|
Re: My opinion. I do my own review.
In reply to tqlla,
5 months ago
|
tqlla wrote:
Michaels7 wrote:
tqlla wrote:
yihlee wrote:
Main area of interest:
Other area, of limited interest:
5D3 deserves the title, but it doesn't mean it's a camera made for everybody - no one single camera is made for everybody.
Is the title camera of the year or SLR of the year? The 5D3 feels like a normal upgrade, and its overpriced(at MSRP). I also say the same about the A99.
The RX1 is expensive, but its a class of its own.
I agree that the 5D III is priced high. But, that's to me. For others it's not. What's funny to me is, people are crying over the price of the A99. This camera is in the same category as this one at a much lower price.
I do agree that the RX1 is the camera of the year. But the A99, if you look at it, outside of the much better dynamic range, noise, full frame and a few more things compared to the A77, it's not a major change compared to it's brother. I guess the same can be said about the 5D III too. Most the changes went into the auto focus. Getting to the point, people chose their cameras for different reason. I chose the A99 because for me it's the better camera. Better, meaning, the dynamic range is better, evf etc. But what I like in the A99, others won't. That's just the way that it is. The most important thing is, the cameras take good pictures and the customers are happy. A magazine isn't going to define our skills. Neither is camera of the year.
Just because the A99 is cheaper than the overpriced 5D3, doesnt mean the A99 isnt overpriced.
You're reply is like saying someone is a little pregnant. Either you're pregnant or you're not. Let's talk economics here. If you're pricing a camera that's similar to a camera that you're competing against at a much lower price, then it is a good deal. The problem with most of the complainer is, they have attempted and failed when trying to compare the camera to the D600. Two different cameras and the A99 is meant to compete against the 5D III. The A99 is cheaper than the initial A900 price. People are crying over the price, but many forget, before Sony stepped into the f.f. game, Canon was one of the few that were both doing it and had a very expensive price. Sony changed that with a decent price and they'd forced others to drop down their F.F. price.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | 5 | ||
| 5 months ago | 4 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 4 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 5 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 3 | ||
| 5 months ago | 2 | ||
| 5 months ago | 2 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 2 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 2 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 2 | ||
| 5 months ago | 2 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |