GH1-GH3 compared at ISO 200

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
Detail Man
Forum ProPosts: 12,999
Like?
Re: GH1-GH3 compared at ISO 200
In reply to Fredrik Glckner, 5 months ago

Fredrik Glckner wrote:

Detail Man wrote:

While the OP has talked (in generalaties) on this thread about the resulting RawDigger "Average" vales after applying balck-level subtraction (of 144) to the GH2 RW2 image-data, the table presently published on the OP's blog (and the only numbers that we have to calculate with) are cleary stated in that blog-post to be the results found without any black-level subtraction ...

As I read Anders' reply, he understands that my table is done without changing the black level in the RawDigger preferences, and if I had applied a black level of 144, that would have deducted 144 from my table in the GH3 column.

I may be wrong, though.

Yes, I just tried it with a GH3 RW2 in RawDigger, and you are correct that the per-channel Average statistics shift downward in numerical value by approximately 144.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow