
17 hours ago
|
Re: Sony 28-75mm f2.8 why or why not?
In reply to Mescalamba,
5 months ago
|
Mescalamba wrote:
I would buy that lens only if I needed it. Otherwise I would rather live with less sharp Sigma (might not work with Sony A99) or much better choice, Minolta 28-70mm f2.8 G.
Sony 28-75mm f2.8 isnt bad lens, problem is that its re-badged Tamron. And its really boring lens with really bleak output. Quite sharp - yes, quite contrasty - yes, born without personality - absolutely yes. Wouldnt want it even for free..
I didn't know lenses have personalities. In any case, if it's got everything else, l'd buy it.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |